Victor Lilov vs Juan Carlos Fuentes Vasquez Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Vasquez's second serve performance over the last six months shows a win rate of 32.94% in second serve points, compared to Lilov’s 43.89%. Does this give Lilov an advantage? Quite possibly, as strong second serves correlate with match success.
• When it comes to returning second serves, Vasquez and Lilov are nearly identical, with win rates of 48.72% and 48.64% respectively. Who is better at handling first serve returns? Lilov, with a higher 30.37% compared to Vasquez's 27.17%.
• Under pressure, Lilov saves 50.73% of breakpoints, slightly outperforming Vasquez's 46.15%. This might sway in-game betting in Lilov’s favor.
• Looking at match wins over the past year, Vasquez has a win rate of 54.55% (6/5) and Lilov edges slightly ahead at 55% (22/18). How close is their match-winning ability? Very close.
• Vasquez excels on hard surfaces with a career win rate of 60%, while Lilov is strongest on clay with 55%. On which surface will they meet? This could affect the outcome significantly.
• Both players largely compete at the $10K level, with Vasquez playing against stronger opponents with an average rank of 94.27 versus Lilov’s 392.05. Does this give Vasquez a toughness advantage? Potentially, due to facing high-caliber competition.
• If the match extends to a deciding set, Vasquez boasts a 75% win rate, outperforming Lilov's 67%. Will endurance play a role in this match?
• Break point conversion is a critical stat; Lilov leads with 33.77% conversions compared to Vasquez's 26.67%. Will Lilov capitalize more on key opportunities?

Editorial Prediction (July 22, 2025, UTC):

Both Vasquez and Lilov exhibit closely matched overall performance stats, with each player showcasing distinct strengths. Lilov seems to have an edge in second serve points, first serve return performance, and achieving a higher rate of breakpoint conversions, suggesting he might capitalize on opportunities more effectively.

However, Vasquez's experience in facing stronger opponents and his remarkable ability to win deciding sets could play a decisive role in competitive bouts. Additionally, Vasquez displays a stronger win record on hard surfaces, which merits consideration based on the match venue.

Ultimately, when assessing the combined strengths in serve performance, breakpoint conversion, and the relative level of opponents faced, Lilov might be slightly favored to win the upcoming match, barring any significant surface or event-specific advantages for Vasquez.